MTR

Kingspec SSD reliability - IDE PATA SSD - Slow down failed - TRIM, Garbage Collection

KingSpec SSD - Buyer Beware!

In 2012, I purchased a KingSpec 128GB IDE (PATA) SSD. The retailer was Link-Delight-Oz, a seller on Ebay. It took about two weeks to arrive (from China to Australia). This drive was used to upgrade an older IBM ThinkPad notebook computer.

Using Ghost to copy the partitions from the mechanical drive to the KingSpec SSD was problem free. As soon as the SSD was installed in the ThinkPad, everything was fast. Windows XP took only 15 seconds to fully boot to the desktop. The improved speed breathed a new lease of life into the ThinkPad.

Slow Downs and eventual failure

Unfortunately, after 2 to 3 months, the drive started to slow down. There were unexpected pauses during periods of high disk I/O. Write speeds started to decline rapidly. Strangely enough, read speeds were still very good, and remained so.

One morning, my ThinkPad took much longer than usual to boot. I was then greeted by a frozen Windows desktop, with the hard disk activity light constantly lit. Eventually, windows blue-screened. After resetting, the Windows wouldn't boot anymore, always halting at a blue screen (INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE). The Kingspec was half dead; it would refuse to be written to.

Data Recovery

Fortunately, I had a recent backup of my data. I still wanted to retrieve my more recent files, so I decided to perform data recovery.

My initial attempt was to install the SSD into an IDE-USB caddy. I duly plugged the caddy into another computer, and Windows went ahead and installed the new USB drive. Unfortunately, that was as far as it got. From this point on, the Event Log started filling up with errors like: "The driver detected a controller error on DeviceHarddisk1D."

I figured that in order for windows to mount a drive, it would need to be able to write to it. The mounting failed because the Kingspec SSD controller kept returning errors whenever data was to be written or modified. So, another method was needed.

My second attempt was to mount it read-only in Linux. This time, the only hurdle was to 'force mount' the NTFS partition - it was not cleanly unmounted by windows (during the ill-fated boot).

After it was mounted as read-only, I was able to copy everything off the Kingspec SSD to a spare disk.

Warranty - privacy concerns

Being unable to delete, format or otherwise wipe my data from the SSD meant that I could not send it back under warranty because the drive contained sensitive files. I would not be comfortable sending a drive full of private data back to the manufacturer, even more so to one in China.

Buyer Beware!

I would recommend Kingston, OCZ, Intel, Samsung. Kingspec SSDs are unreliable. The price may be cheap, but you get what you pay for - Cheap 'n' Nasty!


Comments

billy, Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:13 am: Reply
they suck

John, Tue, 12 Apr 2016 08:52 am: Reply
It is because you used Windows XP. Use Windows 7 or newer and do a clean install.

Jody Bruchon, Tue, 17 May 2016 11:39 am: Reply
I have an ancient VIA C7-M powered netbook in which I installed a 1.8" KingSpec 32GB SSD to replace the TERRIBLE 30GB 1.8" hard drive it came with. I learned that KingSpec SSDs still require alignment on a power-of-two sector boundary. I initially dropped an XP image which defaults to a starting sector of 63, but the system was not as fast as I felt an SSD should be, so I tried a manual image drop tweaked to start at sector 64 instead. The performance difference was amazing. I am actually writing this comment on that old, slow netbook right now! If you don't align your partition and you have the default 4KB NTFS cluster size, EVERY CLUSTER OCCUPIES TWO 4KB FLASH PAGES! This means that all reads and writes require double reads and double writes to complete correctly. Your drive probably wore out prematurely due to this. Unfortunately, XP doesn't give you a way to align like I did; I performed some low-level trickery that is beyond most power users' knowledge, but I think there are SSD align tools for XP that could have done it.

KingSpec SSDs are generally pretty decent. The fact that you could still read from the drive is pretty nice; most better-known brand SSDs just fail completely when writing is no longer possible. I would also recommend avoiding OCZ at all costs, by the way. OCZ drives seem to fail much faster than even weird off-brands like Apotop.

Jessejeff, Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:25 am: Reply
Same problems running OS X with the kingspec 500 gb ssd. Never run your OS on a kingspec or other cheapass ripoff

  Add a comment


Your name:

Comment:

Verification code:
Verification Code Type the letters and numbers that you see.